Monday, September 22, 2008

economic sustainability


 

AFTERNOON SESSION

ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY

 

 

People in the group include Landholders, local government, aged care, university students, teachers

 

 

·       The questionnaire discussed

·       Region strengths / weaknesses

  •  Ag resource sector very strong – but group adds that there is a lack of effective use of resources. Water supply less than optimal – opportunity to improve the water system – poor health of the land. Landscape is operating below its potential . Education in resource management is 1950s thinking needs to be changed into sustainability based education.
  • We are different to Tamworth. Must not chase the successes of Tamworth for example. High transport costs here.
  •  Chiswick is at risk/winding down. Opportunity to do (agricultural) sustainability research.
  •  The potential in sustainability education is also a strength of the region? On the negative side over-reliance on education is a weakness. Distance education is huge and growing. Too much resting on laurels of UNE. Lack of alternative enterprise.
  •  Reliable and plentiful water supply – attract businesses in the future
  • Carbon trading. Farmers are being portrayed as rapists and pillagers of the atmosphere but many are long-term tree-planters/responsible stewards that are not being recognised in the proposed carbon marker systems
  •  Short-term economic gains (‘selling’ water, coal mining) can be uneconomic in the longer term. Resisting and choosing futures carefully is not anti-development.
  •  Government support, such as CSIRO and public education is no longer reliable. Need other initiatives/regional partnerships/RCS etc
  •  Research is prohibitively expensive and risky
  • Costs are rising generally
  • Farmers are improving the sharing of IP. Landcare has helped
  • Import replacement opportunities need to be examined systematically
  •  Vegetables and wine are taking off in this region. Wine-growing in Inverell for over 150 years (pioneer industry)
  •  Processing is all done overseas and then its imported back
  •  Local wool has always been processed overseas: England, Italy, China ...
  • Research ends up on a dusty shelf. Sustainability innovators should be resourced e.g. Chiswick
  •  Need scientifically based policy
  • Profitability drivers now is providing the wrong signal to sustainable development
  •  Eco-tourism opportunities are a strength of the region. Difficult to deal with National Parks. also difficult for private landholders to host visitors - risks, inappropriate visitor behaviour

  • strong community is the envy of all capital cities
  • Transport is a big weakness
  • small acreages  

KEY ECONOMIC STRENGTH
kids leave but they return for the lifestyle


KEY ECONOMIC WEAKNESS
transport
government policy
35-40 year olds are leaving with their children
not enough range of education/employment opportunities


WHAT WILL A SUSTAINABLE NEW ENGLAND LOOK LIKE?
diversification of industry based on value-adding
long-term policy on knowledge based industry - research informed



No comments: